Archive for November, 2011

Recent Articles

Archives

Ready for a Logic Game Workout?

Take the Logic Games Challenge! Manhattan LSAT posted Logic Games Challenge #34 and they invite our listeners to join in the chance to Win $200 off any LSAT Course or any Manhattan LSAT Strategy Guide (your choice!). The latest challenge: Party Problem (Easy)

Challenge Problem of the Week Before you start let us tell you something! You’re about to play the first of two “sister” games (go ahead one game in the archive for the second one). Taken together, the pair can be useful in thinking about how challenging games are derived from simpler ones. Both of these games are pretty tough – though this one should be slightly easier. The LSAT doesn’t usually deliver easy games of this type, so we figured we’d honor that tradition and make them both tough.

Dylan is hosting a party and invites eight fickle friends—Lance, Matt, Nick, Oscar, Pam, Reena, Sara, and Tracy—some of whom get along, some of whom don’t. The following conditions apply:

  • If Matt comes, Sara will come.
  • If Lance comes, Oscar and Pam will not come.
  • Matt will come to the party unless both Lance and Reena do.
  • Sara or Tracy, but not both, will come to the party.
 1. Which of the following could be a complete and accurate list of friends who come to the party?

2. Which of the following must be true?

3. If Matt does not attend the party, it must be false that

4. If Oscar attends the party, each of the following must be true EXCEPT:

5. What is the maximum number of people who will come to the party?

6. If Tracy attends the party, each of the following must be false EXCEPT:

 
 

 Post your answers on Manhattan LSAT’s site and your explanation on their LSAT Forum. You have 2 ways to win: (1) Correct Answer Prize: Manhattan LSAT will randomly choose from any submitted correct answers during the Challenge period and (2) Best Explanation Prize: Manhattan LSAT will choose the best explanation posted on our forums.

Good luck!

For more information about Manhattan LSAT and LSAT study options, listen to Comparing LSAT Test Prep Companies: Which One is Right for You?”

For more information about the LSAT, check out Law School Podcaster’s full shows:

 

Leave a comment

New Podcast Guides You Through Optional Essays & Addenda

In the world of law school applications, the personal statement is a well-known part of the admissions process.  Applicants may be less familiar, though, with a part of the application known as “optional essays,” where some schools invite applicants to submit additional information about themselves. 

Sometimes these essays are required, sometimes they are truly optional.  How does an applicant know when to submit an optional essay? What should these essays include? In our latest podcast, Law School Optional Essays & Addenda: What to Say & When To Say It, Law School Podcaster Host, Althea Legaspi, gets answers to these questions and guides you through this part of your application.

Admissions consultant, Paul Bodine lays the groundwork by explaining the basis for “optional essays.”  “Optional essays, on the highest level, are opportunities for the applicant to tell the school more about themselves than they can’t fit into the main personal statement. And so in that sense they are opportunities to round out your application, as opposed to explain negatives in your application. So, optional essays are not the place for exculpatory, explanatory, defensive or negative material. That’s what the addenda are for.”

What’s the point of yet another essay?

Each school may have a different way of using “optional essays” and the topics often vary from school to school. According to Bill Hoye, Associate Dean, Admissions & Student Affairs, Duke University School of Law, for example, “the purpose is to gather more information about the candidate. And we’re interested both in the substantive information that the candidate would provide in the essay, but we’re also interested in whether the applicant is able to compile information, and present it in a clear, convincing, compelling way. Because the application process is actually an advocacy challenge on the part of the candidate and being able to make a case effectively is a skill that’s useful in law school, and probably in legal practice, as well. So, there are really two reasons: One, can you put the information together? And second, does the information that you provide for us help us understand why you would be an excellent student at the law school, and contribute in very significant ways.”

In this show, we delve into the topic and examine how optional essays differ from your personal statement, we take a look at the range of topics schools invite applicants to write about, and how an applicant can use this part of the application to their advantage. Other guests include:

  • Faye Shealy, Associate Dean for Admissions, William & Mary Law School
  • Jamie Thomas-Ward, Director of Pre-Law Advising Services, University of Illinois

 

Listen to the full show to hear more!

Play in new window | Download Leave a comment

Details Make the Story Come Alive

Many writers tend to confuse adjectives and adverbs (“describing” words) with details. When adjectives and adverbs are used to emphasize an emotion or emotional state, they can add very little to the description of an experience and can even undermine it. However, when that emotion or emotional state is described properly, it can bring a story to life.

Example 1: “With the award in hand, I felt extremely proud of my accomplishment.”

In the case above, the word “extremely” does not help create or enhance the reader’s mental picture, but merely states the obvious. After all, the difference between being “extremely proud” and “proud” is very little, considering that pride is naturally an “extreme” emotion. This just doesn’t effectively convey how the writer actually felt.

Example 2: “Approaching the podium to receive the award, I admittedly felt faint. Even though my hands were shaking, I managed to give our company president a firm handshake when she passed me the award. As I began speaking to a crowd of my colleagues, I finally understood what it meant to be proud of myself.”

In this second example, the details of the story (“felt faint,” “my hands were shaking”) create an image in the reader’s mind. The reader is not relating to the simple adjectives that reinforce existing impressions, but experiencing details that bring color to the story. In the first example, the story does not change if the word “extremely” is removed, but in the second, real emotion is conveyed.

We encourage our candidates to avoid adjectives that reinforce an existing emotion and to write descriptively to capture a spirit.

This post is authored by jdMission, a professional law school admissions consulting firm, specializing in helping law school applicants identify and showcase the strongest aspects of their candidacy in their application.

You can sign up for a free one-on-one consultation with jdMission by submitting the form found at http://jdmission.com/consult.php.

For more information on this topic, listen to our podcast Law School Personal Statements & Letters of Recommendation: Where to Begin?

Play in new window | Download Leave a comment