Archive for July, 2011

Recent Articles

Archives

Deciding on Law School: Get the Info Before You Apply & Use It!

Not to be confused with business school itself, the business of law school has been getting a fair share of attention lately:

•  Just last weekend, in an article in The New York Times, Law School Economics: Ka-Ching!, David Segal wrote that “[l]egal diplomas have such allure that law schools have been able to jack up tuition four times faster than the soaring cost of college. And many law schools have added students to their incoming classes — a step that, for them, means almost pure profits — even during the worst recession in the legal profession’s history. . . In short, law schools have the power to raise prices and expand in ways that would make any company drool. And when a business has that power, it is apparently difficult to resist.”

•  Commenting on a May 2011 NYT article, Law Students Lose the Grant Game as Law Schools Win, the WSJ Law Blog posted that “some schools lure top students with offers of merit scholarships that pay thousands of dollars annually. The schools bolster their U.S. News rankings by attracting academic overachievers, but there’s a catch: the students must maintain high GPAs to retain their scholarships, which students often are unable to do partly because schools grade on a curve, thus ensuring that only a small percentage of student will earn the sort of grades needed to retain their scholarship money, according to the Times.”

•  Last year, two Vanderbilt law students started an effort — Law School Transparency — to collect more accurate employment data from law schools.

•  The ABA Council on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar has taken steps to approve new standards to report law school placement data.  The new reporting rules, which have been reported on extensively by Law School Transparency, will require schools to report jobs data on whether a new J.D. grad is employed in a job requiring bar passage, in a job for which a J.D. is preferred, in another professional job, in a nonprofessional job, or in a job of unknown type. For those that are not employed, the categories of possible responses are will be pursuing a graduate degree, unemployed not seeking, unemployed seeking, or status unknown. In addition, the schools will have to report if the jobs are full time or part time and long term or short term. Schools will also need to indicate the number of jobs that are funded by the law school or university. Jobs will be broken down further in law firms of various sizes, business and industry, government, public interest, judicial clerkships, academia, and employer type unknown.

•  At least for the first year with these new standards, the ABA will be partnering with the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) to try to get accurate post-graduate employment data to prospective law students.  Now let’s hope they use it.

•  In June 2011, Robert Morse, Director of Data Research for U.S.News & World Report and Editor of the US News Rankings, posted the following on the magazine’s website:  “[t]here is a very strong likelihood that U.S. News will change the way it computes “at graduation” and “nine months after graduation” legal placement rates that will be used in the methodology for the upcoming 2013 edition of the Best Law Schools rankings, as a result of recent action taken by the American Bar Association.”

For those considering law school and for those about to apply this fall, the take-away here remains the same.  Placement rates matter.  A lot (especially if you’re going to borrow money to pay for school).  Look closely at the placement data of the law schools you apply to, weigh carefully the risk of taking on six-figure educational debt, especially given the uncertainty of a challenging legal job market and read the fine print of any merit scholarship award.  In deciding which school you’ll attend, think about what you want to do with your law degree, and be realistic about your chances to service that debt on graduation.  We covered this topic back in December 2009 in our post, Due Diligence and Reasonable Expectations Before You Go to Law School and in posts since then.

Treat the decision of where you go to law school as you would any investment of your time and money.  In our podcast Financing Your JD: How to Pay For Law School, Assistant Dean of Enrollment Services at Fordham School of Law, Stephen Brown, says law school is an investment and you should treat it as such. “It can be a good or bad investment, depending on what you’re looking to do with your life, depending on your choices. So pay attention to this as you would at any other investment. You find people to do more research on cars than law school, so that’s important.”

Leave a comment

This Week’s “Ask jdMission” Tip for Applicants: How to Ask for Letters of Recommendation

A student asked what is the best way to approach a professor for a letter of recommendation.  He asked whether he should simply send an e-mail or meet the professor in person.

If at all possible, it is best to approach a recommender in person to request that he/she write a letter of recommendation for you.  Since law schools ask for academic recommendations to garner how you might fare in law school, there are certain items you should give to the recommender to help him/her write a truly great letter of recommendation.  You want to give him/her a copy of the work that you submitted in his/her class to jog his/her memory as to your reading, research, reasoning and writing skills.  It is helpful to also give him/her a list of the schools you are applying to and a brief explanation as to why you want to go to law school.  If you  have a copy of your personal statement or an outline, that would also be of great benefit to him/her.  You also want to give him/her a copy of your resume and your transcript.  Lastly, you want to give him/her a stamped and addressed envelope for mailing the letters to the Law School Data Assembly Service.  With all these items at his/her fingertips, you are ensuring that you have done everything in your power to submit a truly memorable letter of recommendation.

This blog post is authored by jdMission co-founder, Sunitha Ramaiah. After graduating Princeton University, Sunitha attended Columbia University Law School. She practiced corporate law for eight years, before she met Jeremy Shinewald, the Founder of mbaMission, the world leader in MBA admissions consulting. Together they started jdMission to provide the same stellar service to JD candidates.

Do you have a question about applying to law school? Submit your inquiries to info@jdmission.com, and we might choose your question to answer in an upcoming blog post here at Law School Podcaster.

You can also sign up for a free one-on-one consultation with jdMission by submitting the form found at http://jdmission.com/consult.php.

And be sure to check back here every other Tuesday for tons of great law school admissions tips and application advice. We look forward to hearing from you and wish you luck on your road to law school!

Leave a comment

Seeking Info about Life INSIDE BigLaw?

If you want to know what BigLaw associates say about the “quality of life inside” the firms they work for, check out the newly-released Vault 2012 “Best Law Firms to Work For”(find the complete rankings here). 

Law 100You’ve heard about the grueling hours, tight deadlines and demanding work, but the atmosphere and conditions inside firms can and does vary; the associates at some firms are more satisfied than others. As the new Vault survey reveals, when it comes to associate satisfaction, one firm stands out:  Williams & Connolly. 

Joining Williams & Connolly as the top Vault 2012 Best Firms to Work For are the following firms:

1. Williams & Connolly LLP
2. Ropes & Gray LLP
3. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
4. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C.
5. Foley Hoag LLP
6. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
7. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
8. Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
9. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP
10. Fish & Richardson P.C.

Just what criteria are used to compile the list? Vault describes the survey in the following way:

The quality of life rankings go behind the law firm doors through insider perspectives on law firm life. Associates provide their opinions of their law firms on a variety of topics, including Overall Satisfaction, Associate/Partner Relations, Compensation, Firm Culture, Formal Training, Informal Training, Green Initiatives, Hours, Office Space, Pro Bono and Selectivity. Vault analyzes these responses and determines the Best Law Firms to Work For based on the following formula:

40 percent satisfaction
10 percent hours
10 percent pay
10 percent associate/partner relations
5 percent diversity (overall)
5 percent formal training
5 percent informal training
5 percent pro bono
10 percent business outlook.

According to Mary Kate Sheridan, Vault’s Law Editor, “Williams and Connolly clinched the top spot for quality of life (Ropes & Gray held the No. 1 spot for the past two years and this year is No. 2). . . Overall, Williams & Connolly associates seem to feel appreciated and respected for their work, are pleased with their relationships with firm partners and are enthusiastic about the level of responsibility that they receive, even at junior levels.”

Read more at Vault’s 2012 Best Law Firms to Work For

For more information about law school rankings, check out our podcast Law School Rankings:  What Do the Numbers Mean?

Leave a comment

New Podcast Focuses on LSAT Reading Comprehension

When it comes to LSAT test prep, many students focus their practice on logic games and logical reasoning sections, which look and feel very different from anything they’ve seen before.  In contrast, the LSAT reading comprehension section looks kind of familiar and tends to get short shrift from  test-prep students.  But it’s a mistake to overlook this section, and you might be leaving potential points on the table, say test prep experts, in our new podcast Mastering LSAT Reading Comprehension: Strategies to Improve Your Speed & Accuracy.

There are things you can do to impact your reading comp score and Law School Podcaster Host, Diana Jordan, interviews the following guests to get their advice:

  • Noah Teitelbaum, Manhattan LSAT, Managing Director
  • Glen Stohr, Kaplan Test Prep & Admissions, Senior Product Developer
  • Matt Riley, Blueprint Test Prep, Founder & Instructor
  • Ranika Morales, LSAT test-taker and student

Listen to the full show!

Play in new window | Download 1 Comment

Tonight is Your Chance for a (Free Online) Post-Game Analysis of June 2011 LSAT!

LAW SCHOOL PODCASTER Listener Alert!

If you took the LSAT on June 6th and were less than pleased with the outcome, then you have the opportunity for a free online review of the exam tonight (Monday night (7/11) at 8pm EST). Two Manhattan LSAT instructors will be breaking down some of the harder questions from the exam and offering advice on whether or not retaking in October is a good choice for you.

Speaking of ‘the great retake debate’, here are a few questions, that you should ask yourself as you begin to make your retake considerations (couresty of Manhattan LSAT):

Did I have a bad day? If June 6, 2011 was a bad testing day for you (e.g. the person next to you had a nervous twitch, severe halitosis, or uncontrollable flatulence that threw you off your game), you probably knew it upon leaving the exam. We train our students to practice predicting their scores. So ask yourself: did this feel like an awful exam during and after the test? If yes, chances are you won’t have a bad day again. Check to see your law school’s LSAT policy, keep studying, and prepare to rock the exam next time. If no, then it is likely that you have a lot of work to do to get where you need to be. 

 Are the law schools I am applying to considering my top score only or an average of all recorded LSATs? For obvious reasons, this is a huge consideration! If your June score was fairly consistent with your practice test averages, and the school(s) you are applying to are going to average your LSAT scores, why risk posting a lower score?  

Did I dedicate enough time to LSAT prep? Many students underestimate the amount of work it takes to properly prepare for the LSAT. Did you give yourself enough time to study? Could you have done a bit more? If you answered “yes” to this second question, reevaluate your study regiment and consider taking the exam again. Keep in mind that most people don’t improve that much the second time around. The average person who re-takes the LSAT with a score between 150 and 160 improves only 2.4 points on the re-take (and the re-take improvement gets worse as you go up the score ladder).

And don’t forget to listen to Law School Podcaster’s full show on this topic:  Cancelling or Retaking the LSAT: What to Do When Test Day Doesn’t Go As Planned

Play in new window | Download Leave a comment

Ask jdMission: Tuesday’s Tip for Law School Applicants

What’s on the mind of law school applicants? Here’s this week’s question and answer from jdMission:

 Recently, a law school applicant asked how an admissions committee might view the fact that she worked part-time throughout college while she was a full-time student. To be able to balance her school work with her job responsibilities, she had to take a minimal course load, and she was concerned now that an admissions committee might instead think that she had taken a minimal course load as a way to get better grades. 

In short, this applicant need not worry about such a perception on the part of the admissions committee, and similarly, you should not be concerned that your target school will frown upon whatever less traditional path you may have taken yourself. As you undoubtedly already know, putting yourself through college is a very admirable accomplishment. This candidate should simply explain her seemingly erratic—but in fact entirely understandable—academic path via an addendum. She does not need to apologize for her course load choices, but should address and explain the issue of balancing a job and college course work, the challenges she faced in doing so and how she ultimately dealt with (and ideally overcame) these challenges. If you have a similarly unusual element in your candidacy, be sure to explain your decisions and give a window into the values that motivated you. As a result, you will leave the admissions committee with a positive impression and will most likely advance your candidacy. Good luck to you! 

Ask jdMission is hosted by jdMission co-founder, Sunitha Ramaiah. After graduating Princeton University, Sunitha attended Columbia University Law School. She practiced corporate law for eight years, before she met Jeremy Shinewald, the Founder of mbaMission, the world leader in MBA admissions consulting. Together they started jdMission to provide the same stellar service to JD candidates.

Do you have a question about applying to law school? Submit your inquiries to info@jdmission.com, and we might choose your question to answer in an upcoming blog post here at Law School Podcaster.

You can also sign up for a free one-on-one consultation with jdMission by submitting the form found at http://jdmission.com/consult.php.

And be sure to check back here every other Tuesday for tons of great law school admissions tips and application advice. We look forward to hearing from you and wish you luck on your road to law school!

Leave a comment