Archive for January, 2011

Recent Articles

Archives

Where are the hot jobs?

Some legal practice areas are growing fast, while others continue to fizzle. Here are six to consider for your future.    

Not all legal practice specialties are created equal. And in this down economy, the hotter practice areas are fueling entry-level hiring at the small- and medium-sized law firms, where the vast majority of law school graduates get jobs.

“Law firms specializing in bankruptcy, foreclosure and litigation are adding staff to meet increased demand for their services,” said Charles Volkert, executive director of Robert Half Legal. One-third of all lawyers interviewed by Robert Half Legal Hiring said they plan to add legal jobs soon, a figure that is improving from quarter
to quarter.

Despite contrary reports, economic recessions aren’t all bad for lawyers. It actually opens up more career prospects in law firms of all sizes, especially in smaller- or what are known as boutique-firms, experts agree.  “Some of the determining factors that drive particular practice areas are often a reflection or a reaction to economic issues and political agendas,” said John O’Connor with Lumen Legal, a Detroit-area legal staffing services firm. “As a nation, we are climbing out of one of the worst economic recessions that we’ve seen in this generation. As a result, corporations, as well as individuals, are seeking the legal system as a remedy for financial losses.”

A word of warning: Some of these areas may only stay hot for a short time based on the financial industry’s ups and downs, said Robert Denney, president of Robert Denney Associates, a law firm consultant group.

“You have to think ahead,” said Sabrina Trovato Halloran, associate director and director of Pro Bono for Career Development & Public Service at Boston University. So if you want to practice litigation in Boston, you should be aware there are too many already in that pipeline. Thus, it makes sense to consider corporate work, which is more of an up-and-coming arena, she said.

Six of the hottest legal practice areas are:

Labor and employment

This area is growing because employees and employers are sorting out differences resulting from what O’Connor calls “defensive corporate maneuvers made during the economic downturn.” Another issue? Discrimination suits by laid-off employees and employers monitoring employees’ use of social media at work. Texas and Chicago are great spots to look for jobs, he added.

Bankruptcy/Foreclosure

Even as the recession winds down, these practice areas will still be going strong. The so-called housing bubble created a long-term mess, so experts say the demand will be high for years to come. “Pre-packaged bankruptcies are raising the temperature even more,” said Denney. Foreclosure defense also is emerging as an interesting sidebar to this practice area. Attorneys in Florida, Nevada and across the Midwest, particularly hard-hit states like Michigan, are seeing a surge of business, attorneys said. Another surprising area of need is the Pacific region, which includes Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, Volkert said.

 Healthcare

Denney notes that the law is affected by issues such as aging of America, growth of lifecare facilities and changes in employer regulations in light of the new Obama healthcare plan. Legal issues surrounding FDA regulation also are said to be growing. Any area with high popularity densities such as Arizona, Florida and parts of the Midwest are expected to enjoy a rise in the healthcare practice area.

Intellectual property

According to O’Connor: “If there is a positive side to an economic downturn, it’s that it often forces individuals and corporations to think differently and creatively, often resulting in new products, inventions or ideas.” Areas like social media and e-commerce also are enjoying a surge. New York and California are seeing strong growth, especially in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Energy/Environmental

Some may argue this practice area is not as relevant, but Trovato Halloran disagrees, especially in light of mega-disasters like the Gulf oil spill. The Obama administration also may make the environment a key issue, O’Connor said. “As ‘green’ initiatives continue to accelerate, demand for attorneys with experience in these areas is expected to grow,” Volkert added. Denney believes Pennsylvania and the Northeast will see great growth here.

Emerging companies

Denney believes there is room to grow in this arena, considering how many new entrepreneurs the nation is seeing. “It is surprising, but the number of former big-company executives starting new businesses hit a four-year high in 2009 and continues to increase,” he said. Boston is a great area for this kind of company, particularly in newly popular areas such as life sciences and pharmaceuticals, said Trovato Halloran.

Denney is a big fan of boutique firms that specialize in areas such as labor or litigation. “Five years ago, these are the firms the big law experts said were dead,” Denney said. “Not so. They are doing very well because big corporations are looking at their strong expertise in certain practice areas. Will they get as much starting salary? No, but their employment security could be a heck of a lot better.”

This story was authored by Karen Dybis and published originally in the Fall 2010 issue of preLaw magazine.  Click here for the digital edition of the Fall 2010 issue or visit the preLaw Magazine website for more great content about law school.

Leave a comment

New Resource for Law Students Interested in Entertainment, Media & Sports Law

Do you find all the hoopla of the Hollywood awards season and the buzz about Oscar nominations more than just a little interesting? Well, we have some great breaking news for all you future lawyers who want to work in the area of entertainment, media and sports law.

The Association of Media and Entertainment Counsel (AMEC) has just formed a new Law School Section, and will host student sponsored events at law schools throughout the country and hold an annual essay competition, with the winner invited to attend AMEC’S Counsel of the Year Awards Ceremony in Hollywood. The winning essay will also be printed in AMEC’s award winning news magazine: M/E Insights Magazine. The purpose of the Law School Section is to promote interest in, and advance the education of entertainment, media and sports law.

The new section will be headed by the all-star lineup of Steve Krone, Director of the Biederman Entertainment and Media Law Institute and Professor of Law at Southwestern Law School, and Nancy Rapoport, Gordon Silver Professor of Law at University of Nevada, Las Vegas. “It is a very exciting new opportunity for law students interested in working in the entertainment industry,” states Krone. Rapoport adds “personal relationships are what make the entertainment world turn, so this committee should help students get their start in this field.” The new Law School Advisory board members include Brenda Hampden, Associate Professor of Law at Seton Hall University School of Law; Samuel Fifer, Adjunct Professor at Northwestern University Law School; Ellen Goodman, Professor of Law at Rutgers School of Law; Silvia Kratzer, Professor of Film and Television at UCLA and Chapman University; and John Kettle, Professor of Law at Rutgers School of Law.

If you’re thinking about a career in the entertainment industry, the AMEC is a great organization to check out and learn more about. AMEC is the only organization of its kind, promoting excellence in entertainment law and designed to support the career development, and honor the achievements, of in-house counsel and business affairs attorneys at entertainment and media companies.

Stay tuned to Law School Podcaster for more news about the student sponsored AMEC events at law schools around the country!  We’ll also feature some great content about this exciting field!  

Leave a comment

American Bar Association May Drop LSAT Requirement

 “All in favor of killing the LSAT requirement say ‘aye.” 
 
Last week Inside Higher Ed reported that the American Bar Association is considering ending a rule that law schools require the LSAT in order to receive ABA accreditation. Right now this is just an idea being kicked around by an ABA panel charged with reviewing the associations accreditation rules, but if the panel recommends the change (which many believe it will), ABA approval may not be far behind.

Why the proposed change? Many schools claim that the LSAT requirement takes away flexibility in the admissions process, because they have no choice but to report those scores to the magazines that that publish annual rankings (ahh, the rankings again). Since each school needs to keep up with the Joneses and keep their mean LSAT scores high (lest they risk dropping in those hated rankings), they end up turning away some students they really do want.

According to Inside Higher Ed:
 

Donald J. Polden, dean of the law school at Santa Clara University and chair of the ABA committee studying the standards, said that in two preliminary discussions of the issue, a “substantial majority” of committee members indicated that they would like to drop the LSAT requirement. (He confirmed a report on the likely shift in requirements, first published by The National Law Journal.)

Polden said via e-mail that there are “good arguments” for dropping the LSAT as an accreditation requirement. He said such a move would provide “greater flexibility for schools to achieve diversity goals in their admitted classes, permitting schools to experiment with admission programs that benefit the school without being penalized by U.S. News ranking changes attributable to those programs, following some of the thinking of undergraduate institutions on optional standardized entrance exams.” An ABA report last year was highly critical of the way many law schools are obsessed with high LSAT averages, which lead to higher rankings from U.S. News & World Report, and said that the link between test scores and rankings was discouraging efforts to promote diversity among law students.

We’re not sure how many law schools will drop the LSAT requirement if the requirement goes away, although one school, the Massachusetts School of Law, has famously fought the ABA’s LSAT requirement for years. It’s hard to imagine numerous top law schools following suit, but it’s not out of the question that they could end up looking at a combination of other quantified factors to get at the same thing.

If the change does happen, though, one can’t help but feel like it’s a case of the tail wagging the dog: “The rankings are driving some less-than-ideal behavior because they report on LSAT scores. I know… Let’s not require the LSAT anymore! That will fix it.” If that were to happen, then surely U.S. News and other publications will simply put more emphasis on other quantifiable measures, such as undergraduate GPA. We can see it now: In five years there will be an article about the ABA dropping the rule that law schools require applicants to provide undergraduate transcripts. Then they won’t want schools to report how many of their grads pass the bar. That will teach those rankings publishers.

While we agree that too much emphasis is put on rankings, and the rankings themselves may put too much emphasis on standardized test scores, it really seems like the ABA is missing the point. If the LSAT works for admissions officers (and most still say that they do), then figure out another way to solve the rankings problem, rather than stopping what works simply because it creates an indirect downstream problem somewhere else. Dropping the LSAT requirement is an easy change to make, and it may seem like it mitigates the problem, but we guarantee that problem will simply reappear in another form.

Want to learn more about about law school rankings? Check out the Law School Podcaster episode Law School Rankings:  What Do the Numbers Mean?

This guest post is authored by Scott Shrum, the Director of Admissions Research for Veritas Prep. Applying to law school? Learn more about Veritas Prep’s Law School Admissions Consulting services.

Leave a comment

New Podcast Features Networking Tips for Law Students

  • “It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know.”

 

  • “Network, network, network.” 

 

Ok, got it.  No doubt you’ve heard this advice time and time again, whether you’re a current or future law student (or any other professional really). 

But while you know that the network you build is a key factor in your success, the big question for most students remains, how and where to start?  Our new podcast, Networking 101, runs down the essential tips you’ll need as a law student to start you on the road to making connections that inspire, inform and provide value to you and to those you connect with.

Our guests all told us that there are a number of things that  law students can do to start building a network right away. 

Jessie Kornberg, is the Executive Director of Ms. JD – a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing women in law school and the legal profession. 

She says there are organizations and campus activities that you can leverage to make connections.   “Use Ms. JD or whatever organization, your journal or your affinity group or whatever.  Use the activities that you engage in on campus to your advantage in this process and use Ms. JD as the excuse because that first act, that first cold call, is awkward.  You don’t want to have to call and just say, “Hey, I’m Jessie Kornberg.  I don’t know anything about what you do but I think maybe I want to do it.  Will you tell me what you do and how to get your job?” That’s a terrible question to have to ask but if you can call and say, “Hey, I’m Jessie Kornberg.  I’m third year student at this law school.  I’m volunteering for Ms. JD and I’m putting together a panel.  I wondered if I could talk to you about it.”  That’s a much, much easier question to ask.  I would say start with your professors.  Start with your fellow students.  Start with career services.  Go to your alumni network and the professional bar association.  Use your extracurricular activities to leverage those resources to your advantage and get started.  It’s work everyday to do this but it’s still worth it.”

Northwestern law student Katherine Hayes says it may be intimidating but it’s essential to make those connections.  “I think sometimes the student/professor model, particularly in law school can be a little bit intimidating and students are reticent to admit when they don’t know something or sometimes I think to approach someone who seems like an authority figure and I think it took me three years of law school to realize that that’s silly.  Some of the people who have been my biggest champions in law school are my professors.  Granted, I’ve done really well in their classes and I’ve worked really hard but they’re people who helped me.  They’re people who have recommended that I be involved in things and asked me to be involved in things and I think that’s a huge bonus.  I think students are too often frightened almost, because I don’t know what else to say, even with professors who are really approachable.  I think they just don’t think about those contacts as being something that they should take advantage of.  I highly recommend talking to professors and the other thing, too is even if a professor doesn’t have a direct connection for you, they know someone who does.  If you’ve built the rapport and done the work, I think that that’s a great way to start building your network.”

 Other guest include:

Tune in to the full show to hear more on this topic!

Leave a comment

How to Compensate for a Less Than Stellar LSAT Score

David, a senior, stood in my office doorway. I looked up to see a giant smile on his face.

“Yes!”  He gave me a thumbs up. “I finally did it — a 165.”  His LSAT score, on his second try, was finally where he wanted it to be to try for some top schools. And, I’m happy to report, he did get into his top choice school.

Later that day Jason stopped by, looking glum. He was not happy with his score. It was also his second try, and he had done his best.“I guess I’m just going to go ahead and apply and hope for the best,” he said. “Is there anything I can do to help the rest of my application stand out?” 

There are some steps that Jason can take to help position his application. In fact, at a panel of admissions officers that I recently attended, they all agreed that there are ways to at least partially compensate for a less than stellar LSAT score.  

They said if you find yourself in Jason’s position, you should make certain that the rest of your application is picture perfect. For example, you can spend a lot of time on your personal statement to make your application really come to life. One admission officer recently told me that he reads the personal statements first, before he reviews the rest of the application.

 You also have control over your letters of recommendation — to some extent. Try to meet with your professors before they write the letters. You may have to jog their memory with papers you have written for their class.

 Should you write an addendum? If there is a reason that you need or want to explain to the admissions committee why your score is low, a brief addendum can be added to your application.  It is optional, and should be separate from your personal statement.

 If you look at the big picture, there are other factors that can help you. For example, if you are now a senior, shoot for getting stellar grades during your final year to offset your LSAT score. It may mean that you wait another year to apply to law school, but it may be worth it. An upwards trend in your GPA with a strong finish certainly looks good. Good grades in classes that relate to law school in subjects that are analytical in nature or where you can get writing experience can also reflect well. Often admissions officers are more familiar that you might think with the different courses and majors at different colleges and they value courses that will give you analytical and writing skills, which are skills you will need once you are in law school.

 Leadership skills developed through college jobs or activities that can show the admissions committee your unique abilities can also help. If you were thinking about working in a legal setting in between college and law school anyway, that might give you more to write about on your application.

 In the end, if everything else in your application to law school is stellar, you can only help your chances. Of course, your LSAT score will remain an important factor. You have to remain realistic about it. But you don’t have to give up hope either.

For more advice on having a standout application, check out these great podcasts:

This post was authored by Hillary Mantis, the Pre-Law Advisor at Fordham University and a career consultant. She is the former Director of Career Services at Fordham University School of Law. She is the author of Alternative Careers for Lawyers, and Jobs For Lawyers.  This story was originally published in the Fall 2009 issue of preLaw MagazineClick here for the digital edition or visit the preLaw Magazine website for more great content about law school.

Leave a comment

The Debate Over the Value of Law School Goes On

The New York Times recently raised the question “Is Law School A Losing Game?” and suggested that, for many recent law grads, the answer apparently is yes.  First, there is widespread recognition that the job market for lawyers, particularly young lawyers, is terrible.  Little debate there.  Second, tuition is soaring at the nation’s law schools.  Hardly a stretch either. So what’s driving the discussion lately?  The continued disconnect between this gloomy job picture, on the one hand, and the students lining up in droves to take the LSAT, the steady stream of applicants to law school, and the continued proliferation of new law schools, on the other.

The recent Times article suggests that part of the reason for this disconnect is the way that law schools market themselves, the skewed “Enron-type accounting standards” they present in the form of their employed-at-graduation numbers (does it count if a grad is employed at Applebee’s and Home Depot?), and “the gasoline that fuels this system — federally backed student loans — [which are] still widely available.”   

Vault.com’s editors weighed in this week on the topic, with different views.  Vault.com’s Law Editor, Mary Kate Sheridan, posted the story Law School Isn’t a Game – It’s a Serious Investment.  Vault’s Sheridan says prospective students have to consider carefully the return on their investment:

“I think too much blame is being placed on schools. Law school provides an education, not a golden ticket to a corner office and six-figure salary. Ignorance is not an excuse, but it seems to be the central theme for Michael Wallerstein, the main subject of Segal’s [NY Times] article. Wallerstein “knew little about the Thomas Jefferson School of Law” and “assumed that the very scale of law school . . . implied that pots of gold awaited anyone with smarts, charm and a willingness to work hard.” When it comes to a hundred-thousand-dollar-plus investment, it seems irresponsible to rely on assumptions rather than arming oneself with all information available…Individuals entering law school are (hopefully) intelligent, analytical adults, who should leave naivety at the door and fully inform themselves before moving forward. When it comes to employment, there are no guarantees one will get a job, and there are no guarantees one will keep that job regardless of the economy.”

Vault.com’s Education Editor, David Limm, offers a different take in his post, Law Schools Entice Naïve Students Onto Campus With Rosy, Misleading Data.  Limm had this to say about the NY Times story:

“As the article notes, rankings, US News in particular, are at the center of the issue. Only students from top-tier schools can normally get the lucrative BigLaw jobs, and it’s the rankings which control the perception of which programs are at the top. From the schools’ perspectives, it’s an arms race and the ethical implications of skewing data and fudging the numbers are secondary to the impulse for self-preservation. For the second-tier (and maybe third-tier) schools, the rosy view of the legal job market provided by US News, when combined with an ignorance of the actual distribution of average starting salaries, helps get them enormous amounts of tuition money from prospective students, many of whom should have done more research before applying.”

So, the debate goes on.  Perhaps what is most noteworthy here is the attention of major media outlets, like the New York Times, to this topic.  As many well know, the discussion has been raging in the legal blogosphere for a while now.  In December 2009, we posted Due Diligence and Reasonable Expectations Before You Go To Law School, sharing what Law School Podcaster guests have said in recent shows about the debt crisis facing law grads, the value of a law degree and how to treat law school like an investment.  You can also read a post from preLaw Magazine, Is Law School A Wise Investment?

Check out our full shows “The Current Economic Environment: What It Means for Law School Applicants and Students,” and “”Financing Your JD” to hear more on this topic.

Leave a comment

It’s All About Connecting Your Way

It’s the dead of winter for many of us, but career planning and summer jobs are always on the minds of law students.   That’s one reason our next podcast will feature some essential tips to inspire you to make connections that will help you throughout your career -  and guide you on how to get started right now!  

You may be thinking, “I don’t know anyone,” but the fact is you do.  Your peers, family, friends and professors should form the base for your network.  But you need to develop those relationships for them to be meaningful.  To start, it may help to rid your mind of your preconceived notions about what networking is! 

Frank Kimball is the owner of Kimball Professional Management and he meets with hundreds of law students from the nation’s leading law schools every year.  In 35 years, he has interviewed, hired, placed, or counseled 10,000 more.  Kimball says networking is not only about landing a position; it’s about finding a way to build relationships with people, some of whom you might already know. “Well, I guess I’d put it this way.  I don’t even like the word networking anymore because it’s become a time-worn cliché that conjures up images of young people standing around the hotel ballroom throwing business cards at each other.  The point of networking is to connect with an individual and the concept of connecting with an individual is as old as the ages.

In the show, Kimball gives specific suggestions for resources that can help you identify the people you’ll want to connect with, but he says, just being in the room with the people you’d like to get to know, sending an email or finding out you have something in common is not enough.  “If you identify somebody with a common background and interest, then for sure shoot them an email with a copy of your résumé but then you have to pick up the telephone and call that person.” 

Our other guests share insight about what has worked for them as students, as young lawyers, and in business and career development.  They all suggest finding your comfort zone and making connections in a way that fits your personal style. 

Kimberly Encinas, is a litigator at Munger, Tolles & Olsen, LLP in Los Angeles.  Encinas recommends joining specialty associations, as you’ll have a built-in common ground.  “You never know who’s going to end up being a client, especially at my level, in terms of what my firm does.  We represent mostly corporations, so looking to meet business people is important.  There are tons of bar organizations in the city where I am, in Los Angeles.  There’s a bar organization for women, which is the one that I’m mostly active in, the Women Lawyers Association. Pick your group.  There’s the Mexican Bar Association.  There’s Black Women Lawyers etc. so it’s not just the LA County Bar or the American Bar Association you can be involved in.  I would say to try and actually be involved in more specialty bars because you’re going to meet more people who are like you.”

Other guest include:

  • Jessie Kornberg, Executive Director of Ms. JD – a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing women in law school and the legal profession. 
  • Katherine Hayes, 3L student at Northwestern University.

 

Stay tuned for the full show, Networking 101, to hear more!

1 Comment

Get Ready for the February 2011 Bar Exam

The February 2011 bar exam is exactly one month and 16 days away. So, you’ve only got 47 days to learn every crevice of the law, including areas you didn’t even know existed (who thought you’d have to make a separate outline for Commercial Paper?). Forty-seven days probably seems like a long time. Why not wait a few more weeks to start studying – the passing odds are in your favor, right? I say no – don’t risk it. The bar exam marks the beginning of your professional career as an attorney. So treat it the same way you would professional legal work: dedicate yourself.

In my opinion, the best way to tackle the bar exam is to have a plan. I’m not a bar exam expert, but I am a bar exam veteran. Planning helped me to relax and feel prepared on the day of the exam, which was key for my stress level. Below are some tips that I followed in planning for the bar. I can’t guarantee that you’ll pass, but hopefully this advice will help calm your nerves.

1. Listen to your review course. You paid all of that money to BARBRI, Pieper, MircroMash or whatever class you chose. Use it. These companies specialize in preparing you for the bar exam. It might seem like a pain to follow their schedules of outlining and test-taking, but their programs are designed to help you succeed.

2. Stick to a schedule. Like I said above, treat your study time like you would a job. Set the hours that you will work each day, and adhere to your schedule. A routine will minimize distractions and keep you focused.

3. Establish a work zone. Designate a study spot where you can camp out for the next month and a half. Make sure that you have access to everything you need: computer, books, Internet, bathroom, and food. Building familiarity with a spot may help you jump right into work-mode whenever you’re there.

4. Plan your accommodations and travel now. Are you taking the exam out-of-town? Will you need to drive there? Will the test center have parking? Is there anywhere nearby to eat during the exam breaks? Don’t wait until the last minute to sort out these details. Research your travel, food, and parking options now. Even better, enlist a friend or family member to help you out (and if you’re traveling to the bar exam, consider bringing some one along who can drop you off at the test site, bring you food, and help keep you calm).

5. Practice writing exam answers. You are probably taking the test on your computer, but technology can play tricks at very inconvenient times. Don’t let a technology glitch stress you out on exam day. Handwrite some of your practice tests over the next month and a half so that you’re ready for computer meltdowns.

A little preparation can go a long way in helping you get ready for the bar exam. Good luck.

This post is authored by Mary Kate Sheridan, Vault.com’s law editor. She covers legal news and trends relating to top law firms, law schools and the general legal industry. In search of a practical use for her writing, she wound up on the liberal arts path often-traveled: law school. After law school, she worked as a litigation associate in a large New York law firm. Mary Kate holds a BA in English from Mary Washington College and a JD from Columbia Law School.

Leave a comment

Regret the December 2010 LSAT? Learn From Your Mistakes in Free Online Workshop!

“Regrets, I’ve had a few…” crooned Frank Sinatra in the classic Paul Anka-penned tune, My Way.  We all have regrets about 2010, and maybe you regret the December LSAT!

If so, Manhattan LSAT will be reviewing the test in a free live online workshop on Tuesday, January 11th at 8pm EST.  The LSAT geeks there will help us all figure out what can be learned from the test, and help set you straight for a re-take. Sign-up and get moving.

Leave a comment

preLaw Magazine’s Best Value Law Schools

With tuition up and lawyer salaries stagnant, itʼs more important than ever to choose a law school that delivers a good value. preLaw Magazine crunched the numbers to identify the cream of the crop for value. 

Even though Jennifer Keegan had gone to Florida State as an undergraduate, she wasn’t ready to enter law school at the same university without looking around at other places.  “I had a long list of 15 schools including private schools and schools outside the state, because I like trying new things,” she said. “But when I looked at all the factors — actual cost, the amount of career placement, the bar passage rate — I crossed many of the places off my list. FSU had all the things I wanted at an incredibly good cost.”  She’s now a first-year law student at Florida State.  

Kara Wilder, also a first year, was accepted at nine law schools she applied to and thought she wanted to leave Georgia for New York or California. But then she experienced sticker shock. Her first year at one of the other schools could have cost her more than $70,000. She chose Georgia State University instead, where she thinks she can save at least $30,000 a year in expenses. She also said Georgia State was ranked at about the same level academically as other schools she was considering.

 More than ever before, law students should be concerned about the value of a J.D. Tuition and cost-of-living expenses have been rising quicker than entry-level salaries for lawyers. The recent recession has slowed hiring, making it a challenge for graduates with large debt loads.

 To help prospective students, preLaw magazine has crunched the numbers to identify the best value law schools. This year’s list has 60 Best Value schools, with each assigned a letter grade of A, A-, B+ or B. The schools that received an A are also ranked — with Georgia State at the top.

 Law schools make the Best Value rankings if they meet three criteria:  Their bar pass rate is higher than the state average; their average indebtedness after graduation is below $100,000; and their employment rate nine months after graduation is 85 percent of the class or higher. We then weight the schools using the same three factors plus in-state tuition costs. (See sidebar on how we did the rankings for more details.)

 Although most schools are publicly funded, 11 of the 60 schools this year are private, including Brigham Young University and Phoenix School of Law, a school that received full ABA accreditation in June.

 The Best Value study is not designed to identify the schools where students can get their greatest return on investment. While such a ‘financial investment’ approach may be important for some, this ranking is designed for students who want a quality legal education at an affordable price.

 The vast majority of law school graduates either work for a small, regional law firm or in public service. This ranking identifies the law schools that provide the best value for those graduates.  For example, The University of Connecticut’s tuition is approximately $20,000, while Yale Law School, just down the road, is more than $48,000. The median private starting salary for each school ($120,000 for UConn and $160,000 for Yale) would suggest that Yale is a better return on investment. But that is only true if the student is interested in landing a job at one of the nation’s largest law firms.

But if the student’s goal is to work in the public service, then UConn’s median starting salary is $52,000, while Yale’s is $59,000 for public service. In that case, UConn is the better value law school.

Ranked at the top

The top Best Value Law School on our list for 2010 is Georgia State University College of Law, which ranked fourth last year. Second is Brigham Young University’s J. Reuben Clark Law School, which also ranked second last year, and third is  University of Louisville’s Louis D. Brandeis School of Law. Most schools in the Top 20 are located in the Midwest and Southeast with some in the Southwest.

(Click here to see the preLaw Magazine Best Value Chart ) 

Almost all of our 60 Best Value schools are public, as they have been in the past. But due to rising economic problems in state government, funding for higher education is being cut, and new tuition rates this fall are sometimes higher than the figures used on our list. If you are an applicant lucky enough to live in a state with fewer budget problems, a public law school will generally cost less, and you’ll probably end up with less debt.

Even if you go out-of-state and face tuition that can often be double what in-staters pay, most public schools let students change to in-state status after the first year.  That’s true at top-ranked Georgia State and at the University of New Mexico and Northern Illinois University, as well as others in our Top 20. At the University of Kansas and the University of Louisville, it’s much harder to be declared an in-state student, according to school officials. Florida State allows the switch and counsels students on how to do it, as there are strict rules to follow. If you’re interested in trying an out-of-state public school, check out policies carefully in advance so you won’t be disappointed later.

Lower tuition often means less debt to repay after graduation. Average indebtedness of Georgia State graduates in 2008 was $22,129, and only about 69 percent of the class borrowed. Debt is often a function, as well, of the cost of living in the area where you go to law school, which may be the case with many of our Top 20 law schools.

Brigham Young University, although private, receives funding from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to help keep tuition low, its law school dean James Rasband said. Less than 5 percent of the school’s 450 students are non-Mormons.   “We are very welcoming to students of other faiths,” Rasband said. “But many of them find it difficult to adhere to our honor code requirement of no tea, coffee or alcohol. Our tuition this fall will be $10,580 for Mormon students—and $20,500 for those not of our faith. But even so, it’s an awfully good deal.”

 Costly tuition vs. job prospects

But what about the old theory that the more costly the school, the more prestige it has, and the more likely it is that a law student can land a high-prestige, high-paying job? In today’s job market that may be less and less likely to hold true.  “The amount of debt doesn’t drive the kind of lawyer you will become,” said Steven Kaminshine, dean of the Georgia State University College of Law. “You’re not compelled to take on debt. I understand that people often say you get what you pay for, but I think they also know that you can have a private school that is not of the same quality as a public one. That’s why we’re getting high-quality students. Why pay four or five or six times when you can get as good an education here?”

“Value is a total package; it means different things to different students,” said Jennifer Rosato, dean of the Northern Illinois University College of Law, a school that is new to the Top 20 list this year. Her school is the only public law school in the Chicago metropolitan area; all the other schools are private.  “Our tuition is less than half that of the private schools,” she said. “And students now are really looking at what’s going to be their indebtedness. They can do well and get a quality education at NIU; it’s worth it.”

One benefit her school is proud of, as are others in the Top 20 list, is its small size. NIU’s law school has about 320 students in all.  “We have a very warm atmosphere with 21 full-time faculty and professors,” Rosato said. “There are very small classes. Professors are always available; they know the students well, and they know them by name.”

 Although low tuition and smaller debt are important to graduates, students’ ultimate objective is landing a great job. The Top 20 schools on our Best Value list stress that they work hard to help graduates find jobs and offer strong career services programs on campus. 

Help in your job search

“We start talking to students about being proactive in their job search during their second year,” said Stephen Mazza, interim dean of the University of Kansas School of Law, which ranked fifth on our Best Value list. “They can’t wait until the last minute. The days of 100 percent getting a job at graduation are gone forever — if they ever existed.” 

The KU law students who found jobs recently went to the same mix of the same private and public employment as ever, he said, but some are going to smaller law firms in places that wouldn’t have been their first choice.  “But then again,” Mazza said, “the days of everyone graduating from Georgetown and going to D.C. or New York to the firm of their choice isn’t the case anymore either.”

Placement services are strong at Florida State University’s law school, which ranks eighth on our Best Value list. Dean Donald Weidner said his school, located in Tallahassee, has placement programs that target both full- and part-time students.  A key tactic in placement is helping students interact with alumni who could help find jobs for them. Students are invited to all alumni receptions. Alums and sometimes various local bar groups do special sessions with students.   “We’ve started what we call Networking Noshes with students, featuring a particular alumni or practitioner who shares box lunches with a group of students,” Weidner said.  “We have increased interaction with various sections of the Florida Bar to introduce our students,” he said. “We’re very proactive in generating new opportunities, and we’ve made inroads with the national security agencies, including the CIA and FBI, in order to seek out opportunities.

 “We’re in a capitol city of a very popular state, so we have a lot of internship programs and quite a few opportunities for students to get their feet wet,” he said. “We try to do everything we can to be welcoming to employers. We’re moving into video conferencing interviews to make it more cost-effective to interview our students. We have a resume referral service so employers can pick from a group of resumes.”

Do job interviews make you nervous? At Florida State, the school has students suit up for mock four-minute interviews with an attorney, after which their performance is critiqued by other lawyers. Then the student tries it all over again.

 Because of changes in the economy, said Walter Pratt, dean of the University of South Carolina School of Law, his school’s career services department has been holding programs for students thinking of going out on their own to practice law.  “Members of the state bar have come here to talk to them about opening their own practice,” Pratt said. “We’re trying to set up a monitoring system for young lawyers to give them advice, and we’re bringing in accountants to show them how to keep track of their finances.”

Smaller schools can sometimes do better when it comes to placement. Kevin Washburn, dean of the University of New Mexico School of Law, sixth on the Top 20 list, said that since his school has only 340 students and 115 third years, “It’s also easier to help place students in jobs.  In helping students get jobs, said Rasband of Brigham Young, his school draws on the help of a huge network of attorneys from all over the country. The school also has a nationwide externship program.

 Whether we’re talking about Georgia State, Kansas, Northern Illinois, New Mexico, or any of the Top 20 law schools, most students find their jobs in the region where they went to law school, as is true of most law schools. What that means is that when you choose a law school, it might be well to consider whether it’s in an area where you want to spend a few years, if not your entire career. That doesn’t mean you’re locked in, of course.   “Students from KU go all over the country,” Mazza said, “But historically, we’ve had a connection with Kansas City where many of our students work for law firms. But as the economy has contracted, we’ve had to expand our geographic area.  “Most of our graduates stay in New Mexico,” Washburn of New Mexico said. “Out-of-state students often end up staying here.”

About 70 percent of the University of South Carolina law school graduates stay inside the state; 30 percent go outside for their first jobs, Pratt said.

What has helped in job placement at the University of Louisville is the school’s requirement that every student have 30 hours of public service as a condition for graduation, said Dean Jim Chen.  “A significant number have made connections that led to jobs when they were in those public service positions,” Chen said. “Someone might have a public service placement in Legal Aid and then might later become a staff lawyer there. Or students might work in a divorce clinic and find out that they have skills in family law which leads them to work in a firm specializing in that area. The objective is for them to get out of the classroom and engage with a community network of alumni.”   He also said that the school’s students generally stay in the area after graduation, taking jobs in Louisville, Nashville, and Indianapolis, for example.   “But a significant number do go far, far away — Delaware, Pennsylvania, Alaska and to markets across the United States,” Chen said.

 What about passing the bar?

 The bar passage rate for first-time test takers is above the 90th percentile for almost all the Top 20 schools, with Georgia State students scoring slightly above the 94th percentile. But law school officials are quick to point out that since they choose a great first-year class to start with, students are likely to study hard, catch on quickly and do well on the bar. Although classes sometimes include discussions of questions of law that might be on the locally administered bar exams, schools do not offer bar review classes and generally expect students to take those reviews on their own.  “I would say our strong performance on the bar exam is a reflection primarily of the students that we admit,” said Kaminshine of Georgia State. “They’re mature and have a strong, broad overall program. We have no special bar preparation courses. We give our students a terrific foundation, and they have a significant work ethic. They consistently perform at the top of the state.”  “Our expectation is that all our students will pass the bar exam,” said Mazza of the University of Kansas. “But we want them to be well-rounded lawyers who can go beyond answering multiple choice questions on an exam correctly.”

Chen of Louisville echoed that view.  “We have a highly competitive admissions process, and we wind up with a class that’s very carefully chosen,” he said. “They have the ability to succeed in the practice of law.”  But even so, Louisville and other schools point out that they provide a high quality learning environment with outstanding and friendly professors who are dedicated to the success of their students — on the bar exam itself and in a lifetime of the practice of law.

How we did the rankings

Law schools make the Best Value rankings if they meet three criteria:  Their bar pass rate is higher than the state average; their average indebtedness after graduation is below $100,000; and their employment rate nine months after graduation is 85 percent of the class or higher. We then weight the schools using the same three factors plus in-state tuition costs.

Tuition and indebtedness are the most heavily weighted criteria in our computation — accounting for approximately 45 percent each. Employment is approximately 7 percent and bar pass rate is 3 percent. As a result, law schools with lower tuition tend to rank better. But because many schools have similar tuitions, the employment and bar pass data help differentiate an A school from an A- school.

For bar pass data, employment and tuition, we used the most current data from the ABA, which can be found in the current Official Guide to Law Schools.  For average indebtedness, we used data from U.S. News & World Report.

While bar pass data is difficult to compare, due to students taking the exam in different states, we use the average state percent and compare that to the actual pass rate. Thus, a school with an 80 percent pass rate, and 78 average state rate, will fare better than one with an 85 percent pass rate and an average state rate of 85.

There were five law schools this year that missed the bar passage cutoff by less than 2 percent. These schools would have made our ranking otherwise and so we have assigned them a B- in our grading system.

Six schools that were honored last year did not make the cut this year, including the top-ranked school, North Carolina Central University. Unfortunately, North Carolina Central’s law school saw its employment rate drop from 87 to 82.6 percent. At the five other schools that are also not on the new list, the bar pass rate dropped below the state average. 

This feature story was authored by Rebecca Larsen and was published originally in the Fall 2010 issue of preLaw magazine.  Click here for the digital edition of the Fall 2010 issue or visit the preLaw Magazine website for more great content about law school. 

Leave a comment