Archive for November, 2010

Recent Articles

Archives

THE LL.M. WAY

Knowledge and passion.    

 Frank Johns examines his role as a pioneer in the field of elder law in North Carolina, and why this LL.M. specialty area continues to grow with the demographics.

Frank Johns’ passion came out of the 1960s, and was born into what he believed was a counterculture. His belief in individual rights led him to law school at Florida State University College of Law, working in the Florida legislature on areas that were part of his spiritual and faith commitments.

He later moved to North Carolina and went into private practice where he is a partner at Booth Harrington & Johns of NC PLLC, with offices in Charlotte and Greensboro, N.C. Along the way, he organized the non-profit organization, Corporation of Guardianship, for people without guardians. In the time since then, he has become a leader in elder law, guardianship, disability rights, special needs trusts and legal ethics.

“My advocacy is somewhat split between issues related to people with special needs, and people who are older,” he said.  And as the demands on legal practices change with the times, attorneys, like Johns, are finding that to be able to address current legal trends and to be successful in today’s highly specialized world, an LL.M. degree just might give them a leg up on the competition.

In 2008, Johns graduated from Stetson University College of Law with an LL.M. degree in elder law, making him the first attorney in the state of North Carolina to get specialized certification in the growing practice area.  “Elder law is a brand new specialty and has grown with the demographics,” Johns said. “Our nation’s growing population of people over 50 have specific needs that elder law attorneys work diligently to address.” Johns said the outcome of a 2002 interview with a local North Carolina magazine forced him to focus on why he was practicing elder law.  “So many of us are dealing with our parents and grandparents,” he said. “Questions like ‘What do you mean my mother can’t get that kind of prescription?’…I want to advocate these things.”  He is the former president of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, Inc., and in 1989 organized the North Carolina Elder Law section. In 1996 they had approximately 100 members compared to today’s 700 members, and approaching 5,000 members nationwide. He continues to present lectures on elder law topics across the nation.  “What drives me is probably just who I am, but that comes from my family that raised me in faith and really liked taking care of those who needed it,” he said. “That’s how I moved toward issues involving the elder.”

As for specialization in the practice area, Johns said it’s important to get immersion and interaction through clinics, internships or symposiums to really find out if it’s a fit for you.

 “Certainly when I went to law school there wasn’t anything on elder law,” Johns said. “Of the programs that I have seen within the LL.M. context, none of them touch the depth and experience of the faculty that’s delivering the program at Stetson.”

 Stetson offers the LL.M. in elder law as an electronic education program through its Center for Excellence in Elder Law. Students in the program have 24-hour online access to the three-semester academic course.  The Center for Excellence in Elder Law was established to meet the increasing need for legal education and research in the field of law and aging — providing legal education to law students, attorneys, and judges in the field of elder and special needs law and produces scholarly research and writing on issues impacting those who are older and/or have special needs.

 “Everyone knows what’s coming,” he said. “Assisted living homes are going up even now with the economy.”  And Johns said the basic construct of elder law is that it is holistic. “God I love it,” he said. “If you don’t have a passion to help make the quality of the lives of the people serve better than your probably best served in estate planning and tax.”

  The environmental activist

James Simpson always enjoyed the outdoors. Fly fishing, hiking and his understanding of environmental protection started early on in his life.  “Since I was a young boy I wanted to protect the environment,” said Simpson, a Vermont Law School graduate. “I went to law school wanting to practice in environmental law, and after law school was practicing in commercial litigation.”  He practiced with a large New York City law firm, and was a corporate associate at a boutique firm. He was also a judicial clerk for the Vermont Trial Courts.  But he considers this route a “wise choice” because it gave him a better understanding of what law was about.  “Being out there and practicing really helped focus me in terms of what I wanted to do,” he said. “For a lawyer to be satisfied, they have to be really passionate about it. I learned that I wasn’t entirely happy doing the work that I was doing prior to getting my LL.M. degree.”

So he got back to his first love, environmental law, and enrolled in Pace University School of Law.  His internship with Riverkeeper, an New York-based organization that works to protect the Hudson River and safeguard the New York City Watershed, turned into a full-time job after graduating in 2007 with an LL.M. degree in environmental law. “It’s extremely gratifying work,” Simpson said. “I take pride in the fact that our cause is noble and find it very interesting because politics plays a large role.”

Past projects include a variety of issues ranging from the Hudson River cleanup to the threat to New York City drinking water from leaking aqueducts and the relicensing of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant. He also puts his litigating skills to good use by ensuring that agencies are responding and complying with environmental concerns.  “I think that going to law school exposed me to concepts I wouldn’t have known,” he said. “The LL.M. did the same. It gave me a strong understanding of a broad array of concepts of environmental law.”

This guest post was authored by Michelle Weyenberg and was originally published in the October 2009 issue of The National Jurist. Click here for the digital edition or visit The National Jurist Magazine website for more great content about law school.

You can listen to Frank Johns, a 2008 LL.M. in Elder Law graduate featured in this post, describe Stetson Law’s program in the video below.

Leave a comment

Bristol Palin, Causal Fallacy and LSAT Logic

Bristol Palin is still on Dancing with the Stars and not everyone is happy about it, as evinced by the 67-year-old Wisconsin man who shot his television with a rifle upon learning the news.

Billed as a “teen activist”, Bristol has survived despite scoring the fewest points for her dancing ability four weeks in a row.  This means that audience votes that are saving her.  But who’s voting for her, and why?  Some say it’s her supporters’ social networking savvy.  Bristol herself contends it’s because she’s “not Hollywood” and is relatable.

The controversy at this point more than passingly resembles an LSAT question.  Here’s how the argument (according to Bristol) breaks down.

 I’m relatable to many voters.

____________________

Therefore, many people are voting for me.

 Is this a valid argument?  As Whitney Houston would say “hell to the no”.  First, there’s an awfully large assumption here:  namely that because voters like an aspect of a candidate, that means they’ll vote for the candidate.  I might love everything about Obama’s stances on various issues, but that doesn’t mean I’ll necessarily get off the couch to vote for him in 2012.  (It depends on whether or not there’s a new episode of Glee that night).

 In addition, the argument depends on a cause and effect relationship.  As we all know, causal arguments should always be viewed with skepticism on the LSAT.  This is because it’s easy to weaken them by introducing an alternative cause.  For instance, if I claim that I gained weight due to a slow metabolism, a possible (and far more likely) alternate cause might be undue doughnut consumption.  Or the chips and guacamole Chipotle makes that I swear have crack in them.

 In the case of Bristol Palin, it’s not necessarily her relatability that’s causing people to vote for her.  Indeed, the obvious alternative cause sits in the front row during the show wearing rectangular glasses and singing the praises of Alaska.  Perhaps the votes are coming from people who are Sarah Palin supporters.

 The moral?  Always look for an alternative cause when faced with a cause and effect relationship on the LSAT.  That, and it just may be better to have a famous mother than a good rhumba.

 This article is provided by Jodi Triplett of Blueprint LSAT Prep.  Now with live LSAT prep courses in California, New York, Boston, DC, Philadelphia, and Phoenix!

Leave a comment

A Yale Law grad on law school, the Constitution, and whether you should really get that J.D. (Part II)

Nick Pederson is a graduate of Yale Law School. He was gracious enough to answer some of Knewton LSAT Prep’s questions about law school, the legal field, and his current work. (Miss Part I of the interview? Check it out here.)

Some students reading this blog are particularly interested in obtaining a J.D and not practicing law. What kind of opportunities exist for this type of work? Would you recommend pursuing this path?

I think that, as a general matter, students who already know they don’t want to be practicing law in the long term should think very long and very hard about whether it makes sense to go to law school at all. Much of this is because getting a law degree has become a financially risky venture. But this soul-searching is especially necessary for people who don’t even want to be lawyers. People say, of course, that you can do anything with a law degree… the truth, I think, is more complicated… It is easy to enter law school repeating the “I can do anything with this!” mantra — many students do it every year. Soon, however, you realize you are very deep in debt. And soon after that, you realize that the only way to pay off that debt, unless you can land a job at a consulting firm, is to work at a law firm for a while… So now you’ve spent three years studying law, and three years paying off your debt — that’s six years — all in preparation for entering the sector you actually want to be in, which you still haven’t set foot in. So the real question you should be asking yourself is: Why does it make sense for me to spend such whopping sums of money — and at least six years of my life — getting and paying for a degree that will will teach me how to be a lawyer (which I do not want to be), instead of simply entering the profession I want to enter now? Before you take this enormously costly and often painful detour to reach your final destination, in other words, make sure that there is a strong, concrete reason for you to take it.

In your opinion, what kind of person makes a good lawyer? What sort of pre-law-school factors are good predictors of whether someone will last or is suitable for the profession?

There are many different kinds of law, and thus many different kinds of good lawyers. As a general matter, good lawyers are very smart (legal work is difficult)… Generally though I think it is a mistake to think of this in terms of “factors” or “characteristics” that cut a person out for law. You could easily take two people with nearly identical characteristics and find that one hates law and the other loves it. The only way to get a real sense of whether you’re cut out to enjoy life as a lawyer, I think, is for you to actually research it yourself…  Here are some ways to learn whether you’d like law: a) if you can, work with lawyers, and see what they do; b) talk to family friends who are lawyers, and really do a thorough play-by-play of the day-by-day stuff they do…; c) pick up a casebook or hornbook (or ideally both) from a standard law course, like Contracts, Torts, Criminal Law, etc. Do you find this stuff interesting or boring?…  If you go through the whole exercise and you find that all your answers are coming up boring, then law really might not be the right field for you… Basically, I think the question it boils down to is: are there lawyers I envy? Whose lives I would take if I could? If you can honestly say yes, and you are basing that answer on a thorough understanding of what these lawyers actually do, then you are probably the right kind of person to become an attorney.

If you could change something about law school, what would it be?

I would have them do a little more to help out their students graduating into this rough economy. One place to start would be tuition, which, over the past few decades, has gotten completely out of control… Given what’s happened to the legal market, I think tuition being charged is pretty indefensible. I’d love to see law schools tighten their belts and dig into their funds to help out current classes of students, the classes from 2009 onwards, who played by all the rules and saw their whole reason for coming to law school in the first place — the promise of a stable, well-paying job — evaporate.

What is the most surprising way you have used your J.D thus far?

Hmmm… I’m pretty sure it’s helped me get a date or two. Does that count?

Is it true that law school changes your mind and the way you think?

Yeah, I think that’s true to a limited extent. It doesn’t change the way you think about stuff that really matters in life — love, death, meaning, etc. What it does affect, for many of us I think, is the way you approach arguments. Arguments are everywhere, of course: in political speeches, in advertisements, in the nonfiction prose you read in newspapers and textbooks. Law students are trained to sniff out weak arguments and rip them to shreds, and most of us get pretty good at it. Once you can do this, the astonishing thing is how often you encounter ridiculously weak arguments everywhere — including in places you’d really hope not to find them, like Supreme Court opinions.

This guest post is provided by Knewton LSAT Prep. Knewton’s LSAT course includes:

  • Live and interactive web-based classes
  • One-on-one attention from world-class LSAT instructors
  • All 60 released PrepTests, with full explanations
  • 5,947 practice problems, with full explanations
  • Live office hours and 24/7 academic support from LSAT experts
  • Hundreds of concept videos
  • Flexible 1-year membership
  • Guaranteed 5-point score increase

For a sneak peek into Knewton.com, you can enroll in a free LSAT Prep trial today!

Leave a comment

Ready for an LSAT Logic Games Workout?

 Take the Logic Games Challenge!  Manhattan LSAT posted Logic Games Challenge #25 and they invite our listeners to join in the chance to Win $200 off any LSAT Course or any Atlas LSAT Strategy Guide (your choice!).  The latest challenge Pat the Party Planner

Pat the Planner is planning her perfect party. The party will go from 8 pm to midnight. During this time, 8 different musical bands—K, L, M, N, O, P, R, and Q—each of which has at least one member in one of the other bands, will perform, each for thirty minutes.

The following conditions apply:

  • At least one person in band M is in both bands K and O.
  •  At least one person in band R is in both bands N and L.
  • O performs before K but after M.
  •  P performs before L but after N.
  •  No musician can perform in consecutive time slots.

 1. Which of the following could be the order of bands that perform, from first to last?

(A) M, N, O, P, Q, L, K, R

(B) M, N, O, P, L, R, K, Q

(C) N, M, P, K, R, O, L, Q

(D) Q, N, M, L, P, O, K, R

(E) K, N, P, R, O, M, L, Q

2. It could be true that O performs in all the following positions except:

(A) Second

(B) Third

(C) Fourth

(D) Fifth

(E) Sixth

3. If M performs fourth, it must be true that

(A) M performs before P

(B) N performs before Q

(C) O performs after P

(D) O performs before L

(E) Q performs before O

4. If N performs after K, it must be true that

(A) There is 1 possible order of bands.

(B) There are 2 possible orders of bands.

(C) There are 3 possible orders of bands.

(D) There are 4 possible orders of bands.

(E) There are 5 possible orders of bands.

 5. Which of the following rules would have the same effect as knowing that L performs third?

(A) N performs first.

(B) P performs second.

(C) R performs fifth.

(D) P performs immediately before L.

(E) L performs immediately before M.

 6. If R performs immediately before M, the first and second bands to perform could, respectively, be each of the following EXCEPT:

 (A) R, M

(B) N, Q

(C) N, P

(D) Q, N

(E) Q, R

Think you can solve this Logic Game Challenge? You might win $200 off any LSAT Course or any Manhattan LSAT Strategy Guide (your choice!). You have 2 ways to win: (1) Correct Answer Prize: Manhattan LSAT will randomly choose from any submitted correct answers during the Challenge period and (2) Best Explanation Prize: Manhattan LSAT will choose the best explanation posted on the Manhattan forums. Writing your own questions earns you brownie points in that contest.

Post your answer and/or explanation on Manhattan LSAT’s Forum.  Answers to Logic Games Challenge #28 Toss Toss Toss: (1)E (2)E (3)D (4)C (5)C (6)A  

For more information about the LSAT, check out Law School Podcaster’s full shows,The LSAT: Everything You Need to Know About the Test and Conquering the LSAT: Tips for Tackling the Test.  For more info about Manhattan LSAT prep and LSAT study options, tune in to “Comparing LSAT Test Prep Companies: Which One is Right for You?”

Good luck!

(By the way, if you’re wondering why this is #25, Manhattan LSAT decided to replace an old game).

Leave a comment

New podcast….. Mitigating Weaknesses in Your Law School Application

As you prepare your law school application, what part of your application has you most worried?  What do you think the admissions committee will zero-in on?  Is it a weak GPA, or a low LSAT score?  Maybe you’re not sure what to write about in your personal statement, or you are less than confident in your recommendations.   You might be thinking that your undergraduate coursework will fail to impress members of the admissions committee.  Are you struggling with how to tackle a black mark on your record? 

Whatever the weakest component is in your application, don’t worry.  Nearly every applicant has something that can trip them up.  In our latest podcast, Mitigating Waknesses in Your Law School Application:  How to Identify and Fix Your Weak Spots, we take a look at where the weakest links are for most candidates and we get expert advice on how to best present them in your application.

While there are limits to repairing weaknesses, certain things can be done, as Ann Richard, Associate Dean for Admissions and Financial Aid at George Washington University Law School says. “The candidates are who they are.  They’ve done what they’ve done, so there’s no magic bullet that can take care of a problem in the past.  It’s just trying to put the whole package together in the most positive way possible.” 

Make use of all your material, advises Rita Jones, Assistant Dean, Admissions and Financial Aid, Boston College Law School.  “If you look at every part of the application as an opportunity to present yourself, you’re doing the best you can to be the most complete candidate you can be.  That goes for the letters of recommendation.  You wouldn’t want a recommender to repeat everything you’ve put in the résumé.  You wouldn’t want to say in your personal statement everything a recommender has said.  And sometimes applicants will give their personal statements to their reference writer, for background or whatever, and sure enough the recommender, at some point in the letter, repeats what the candidates said.  I consider that a missed opportunity.  You want every piece to build on the other.”

We also hear from Graham Richmond, Co-Founder and CEO of Clear Admit about how being smart about school selection can help your admissions chances and we get tips from Anna Ivey, admissions consultant and author of The Ivey Guide to Law School Admissions on how to mitigate a weakness in your GPA.

There’s a lot more, so tune in to hear the full podcast!

Leave a comment

A Yale Law grad on law school, the Constitution, and whether you should really get that J.D. (Part I)

Nick Pederson is a graduate of Yale Law School. He was gracious enough to answer some of Knewton LSAT Prep’s questions about law school, the legal field, and his current work. Look out for Part II of the interview next week! 

Why did you choose Yale Law School?

The truth is Yale was never my dream school. I’m from Atlanta, I like sunshine, and after getting deeply annoyed that virtually every top law school in the United States was in a terrible climate, I decided I wanted to go to Stanford. But in the end I was drawn to Yale for what I think are the right kinds of reasonsI had gotten really into constitutional history and theory. Yale is really strong on these fronts, with many of the very best names in the field — names that were on the books I’d been reading. Now that I’d gotten in, I wanted to go take classes with these guys.

What was your favorite law school experience?

This is a super nerdy response, but my favorite law school experience was working very closely with two major professors at Yale whose books I’d read before law school and really liked. YLS is a very small community… The laws of supply and demand, therefore, give you a great chance at doing pretty much whatever you want. For some people, this means going into New York and working at Goldman a couple days a week; for others it means leaving school for much of the semester to work on a presidential campaign; for still others it means running national law student associations like NLLSA, ACS, or the Fed Soc. For me, it meant helping one legal luminary with his major book, and working very closely with another luminary on my own research.

Any myths/stereotypes about law school you’d like to debunk?

I don’t know how qualified I am to speak about most law schools… but I am happy to debunk one major myth about Yale Law School. When I applied to law school, people talked about Yale as this kind of idyllic paradise in legal academia, where collaboration was everywhere, competition nowhere, and the everyday stresses of law school were simply not to be found. There is of course some truth to this caricature: the school gives its students tremendous freedom to pursue their own interests, and it does not encumber them with GPAs and class ranks. But Yale Law School is not a relaxed place. It is a tight concentration of some of the most dauntingly intelligent and driven people in the country… With Yalies the pressure comes quite on its own.

Want to tell us what you are working on now?

Sure thing. I am writing a book right now, on a fellowship at NYU Law School. It’s growing out of research I started with those two professors in law school. Basically it is about this long-forgotten founding father — the man who literally wrote the bulk of the Constitution. Turns out this man was a very progressive guy… Nine years after the Constitution’s ratification, however, he died in total disgrace, as a Supreme Court Justice on the run from the law. As a result, his name – James Wilson – was buried with his body. I think it is fascinating that one of the two primary framers of the Constitution was such a progressive man and remains so forgotten. I’m trying to tell Wilson’s story, and, I hope, play a small role in bringing him back to life.

What do you think about the value of the law degree in today’s economy?

Well, the simple truth is that it’s not at all what it used to be. When I started law school, high-paying law jobs were a dime a dozen… But let’s face it: those days are gone. Graduating law students face stiff competition — not only from other competitive law students, but also from the sea of unemployed lawyers that has formed in the past few years, many of whom — unlike students — have extensive lawyering experience. Back in the day, spending $100 to $200K to pay for your J.D. was not a particularly risky venture. You could rest assured that the high salary would be waiting for you at the end, like a jug of cool water at the end of a marathon through the desert. But that simply isn’t true anymore.

This guest post is provided by Knewton LSAT Prep. 

Knewton’s LSAT course includes:

  • •Live and interactive web-based classes
  • One-on-one attention from world-class LSAT instructors
  • All 60 released PrepTests, with full explanations
  • 5,947 practice problems, with full explanations
  • Live office hours and 24/7 academic support from LSAT experts
  •  Hundreds of concept videos
  •  Flexible 1-year membership
  • Guaranteed 5-point score increase

For a sneak peek into Knewton.com, you can enroll in a free LSAT Prep trial today!

Leave a comment

To Re-Take the LSAT or Not To Re-Take the LSAT…

 That is the question on the minds of many aspiring law students. 

If you’re contemplating re-taking the LSAT, start by reviewing the flowchart below.

If you’re looking for more guidance, re-taking the exam is just one of the many topics Manhattan LSAT will be discussing in their upcoming free workshop analyzing the October 2010 exam.  Learn more about this workshop and register by clicking here.

   For more information about the LSAT and LSAT prep strategies, you can also listen to our podcasts:

The LSAT: Everything You Need to Know About the Test

Comparing LSAT Test Prep Companies: Which One is Right for You?

Conquering the LSAT:  Tips for Tackling the Test

Leave a comment

The October 2010 LSAT Curve Analyzed

October LSAT scores arrived in a flurry of tweets on Friday, October 29th.  “Scores are out!” multiple twitterings  proclaimed and the LSAT nabbed a prestigious “trending top” spot for a couple of hours. Students ran to their inboxes to check their scores and grieve or gloat as the occasion demanded.

So the big question now that scores have been released is…how was the curve?  In a word, pleasant.  Test-takers could miss as many as 12 questions to earn a 170, as many as 19 for a 165, and as many as 27 for a 160.  But what evidence do we have to describe the curve in such glowing terms, and what does it mean for students taking the LSAT in December or February?

We put our talented team of Excel experts on the project of  graphing the LSAT score distributions from the last five years.  Here’s what we found:

Our timeline begins with the December 2004 LSAT.  Like the October 2010 LSAT, you could miss  twelve questions and score a 170.  Note that after December 2004, however, the curve became progressively less forgiving, culminating in the infamous December 2005 LSAT where you could only miss eight (8!) questions for a 170.  The games section was the culprit for this horrifying curve.  The first game was an exceedingly straightforward ordering game, followed by two easy games.  The fourth game was difficult, but because most people could navigate the first three games with relative ease, fewer questions were missed on the test overall.  With so many students not missing questions, the curve became incredibly difficult.

After the December 2005 LSAT, the number of questions you could miss for  170 crept upward again until June 2007 (the first test to feature comparative reading) where test takers had the fun of experiencing another “only eight misses allowed for a 170” situation.  Things got better in December 2009 with the early holiday gift of missing fourteen for a 170. Happy Chanukah. On the same test you could miss twenty eight for a 160. Missing twenty eight questions out of 100 on an algebra quiz would earn you a C-.  On the December 2009 LSAT, it gave you a score competitive at many of the top law schools in the country.

Pause here for something you might be wondering about at this point.  Namely, does the fact that you can miss more question on particular LSATs for a 170 (what we’re terming an “easy” curve) mean that the test itself was easy?  Not necessarily.  Take the case of the December 2005 LSAT.  This test had a difficult curve (you could only miss eight questions for a 170), but it was due to an easy games section.  But does this mean that an “easy” curve must originate from a difficult LSAT?

It could.  If the questions are difficult and everyone is missing them, you’ll be able to miss more and still score well.  In this scenario, an “easy” curve translates to a difficult test.  But there’s another possible explanation. If more people take the test who haven’t prepared well, they could miss enough questions to translate to an easier curve.  Think of an algebra quiz that is graded on a curve.  Let’s posit that Joe studied for the quiz industriously and no one else taking it did.  Let’s further posit that Joe missed 10 out of 20 questions, a failing grade normally.  However, everyone else in the room missed more because they didn’t study as much.  Not only does Joe have the highest score in the room, he also has the highest percentile ranking.

What happened on the October 2010 LSAT?

After hearing students’ initial responses from the October 2010 LSAT, we think the second scenario is the most plausible explanation for the generous October 2010 curve.  The test didn’t seem to contain anything particularly difficult.  By the December 2005 model, this could have translated into a difficult curve (missing fewer for a high score).  But it didn’t – you could miss twelve for a 170.  This, coupled with the fact that more people have been taking the LSAT, (almost certainly due to the recession) points us toward the test taking population as the culprit for the easier curve.

Here’s why.  Let’s think through the influx of people taking the LSAT right now.  They’re on the path to law school, probably not because it’s their life ambition, but because they want to wait out the recession in law school and it’s a graduate program that accepts any undergraduate major.  Such people may not understand how much the LSAT is weighed in law school applications, or if they do, may not particularly want to devote the months of study it takes to prepare for this difficult test.  They are, in other words,  a group of test takers who are not as likely not to perform well on the LSAT.  Thus the generous curve.

But even though the curve was easy, it’s important to note that the October 2010 LSAT curve represents, at most, a slight fluctuation when viewed historically.  For the last five years, test takers could miss approximately ten questions and score a 170 on the LSAT. Some LSATs were more difficult and you could only miss eight or nine, but sometimes test takers could miss twelve or more for a 170. Scoring a 160 has remained relatively consistent at missing approximately 25, and so on.

Which makes sense.  The purpose of the LSAT is to provide admissions officers with something that measures you with relative consistency against other applicants.  This can’t be the GPA because of so many variables, like choice of undergraduate major and grade inflation, that come into play.  Law Services puts a great deal of effort into standardizing the LSAT, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that they’ve been successful at it.

What does this mean for you?

Whether you’re evaluating the results of the October 2010 LSAT, or wondering if you’ll get an easy curve for  the upcoming December or February LSATs, the lesson here is not to want a test with an easier curve. The lesson is that, on an exam where your score depends on how well you do in relation to everyone else, you should prepare better than everyone else.  In other words, don’t pray to be saved by an easy curve—pick up those LSAT prep books and study.

This guest post is provided by Jodi Triplett of Blueprint LSAT Prep.  Blueprint has locations across California and in New York, Boston, Austin, Philadelphia, Washington DC, and Phoenix, as well as an online LSAT course.

For more information about the LSAT, you can also listen to our podcasts:

The LSAT: Everything You Need to Know About the Test

Comparing LSAT Test Prep Companies: Which One is Right for You?

Conquering the LSAT:  Tips for Tackling the Test

Leave a comment

Most Innovative Law Schools

Chicago-Kent, Gonzaga and the University of Detroit Mercy are just a sampling of schools reinventing the law school model.

Staid.  Boring.  Predictable.

These adjectives describe what some people think about law school.  Their opinions would change radically if they could see what a select group of legal institutions are doing these days.  These law schools are shunning tradition and trying new, extraordinary methods to help their students jet to the top of their profession.

At the request of preLaw magazine, the nation’s law school deans nominated the schools, faculty and programs they felt were among the most innovative. Whether it is upgraded student services, creative clinics or radical coursework, these educators are taking law school to the next level.

“We want to train our students for the jobs of the 21st Century, the jobs that exist today,” said Mark Gordon, dean of the University of Detroit-Mercy School of Law, one of the 10 law schools on preLaw’s list. “And the traditional model of legal education is not geared toward training students to be 21stCentury lawyers as they could or should be.”  Plus, the people running these ground-breaking programs say they are just plain cool – an adjective they would prefer to have associated with legal education.  “I think when you’re having fun, it is the best way to learn,” said Mike Panter, a veteran trial lawyer and adjunct professor at DePaul University College of Law.  Find out what “cool” things these law schools are doing, from innovative curriculum to student services.

Chicago-Kent College of Law

When computers were just massive, data-crunching monsters, Chicago-Kent College of Law was already pondering how these new machines would affect the practice of law.

Decades later, the law school is still thinking about technology, only on a grander scale, explained Dean Harold Krent. Its award-winning Center for Access to Justice and Technology is changing the way students, faculty and the public utilize the legal profession.  “We focus on how the law intersects technology,” Krent said. “It’s more than just reacting (to technology). We’re predicting what will happen.”  Students can choose from electives covering topics such as e-commerce, electronic discovery, Internet law, biotechnology and nanotechnology. One of Chicago-Kent’s newest courses in litigation technology shows students how to use digital evidence and to manage technology during a trial.

One of Krent’s favorite examples is a group of students who recently took their knowledge and turned it into one of the most successful new courtroom technologies to date: the Self-Help Web Center.  The Center is a kiosk system aimed at helping self-represented litigants become more familiar with the legal system. Users are guided through the process of creating documents like fee waiver forms or motions to extend time to move out in eviction cases.  These Centers are found in state courts across the nation, Krent said, and they have proven so successful that they are now in a pilot program to go into federal courthouses as well.  “By understanding how technology has changed the law, students will become better lawyers in the future,” Krent said.

DePaul University College of Law

Turnabout is fair play at DePaul University College of Law.  A new course called Litigation Lab gives second and third year law students a chance to hear practicing attorneys arguing a case. Then, the lawyers give a listen to what the students have to say.

The result is a mutually beneficial learning environment, according to Mike Panter, founding director of the collaborative skills class. Panter, a DePaul graduate, managed his own litigation firm for nearly 30 years and is a newly appointed Circuit Court judge.  Beforehand, one student project director works with the presenting attorney, collects the relevant materials and summarizes them for the class. During the case presentation, students analyze the case, the attorney’s approach and overall logic. They also learn about everything that goes into a real case from witness preparation to jury questionnaires to closing arguments.  It also provides a true networking experience for students, who have been hired by some of the attorneys presenting to the class.  “Students just completely love it. The lawyers love it. … I think it is amazing that DePaul was willing to try this,” Panter said.  Students sign a confidentiality agreement, so everyone in the class feels relaxed enough to really go at it, Panter said. They can argue, debate and discuss to their heart’s content. Students develop trust, a respect for their own ideas and an understanding that instinct can be a lawyer’s best asset.  “It gets students into lawyers’ heads,” Panter added. “It’s a safe place for students and for lawyers.”

Gonzaga University School of Law

When it comes to curriculum, most law schools agree with the cliché “If it isn’t broke, don’t fix it.” Gonzaga’s faculty took the opposite approach.   In the spring of 2007, the law school agreed to do a comprehensive program review. The result was an overhaul that reinforces the school’s commitment to skills training but also elevates professionalism throughout the curriculum, said Dean Earl Martin.  “This is a grand investment,” Martin said. “I’m so proud of our faculty for committing themselves to this.”

The new curriculum will go into effect in the fall of 2009. The most significant change is a fresh integration between every course, Martin said, touching on Gonzaga’s core values of imparting knowledge, professionalism and skill enhancement.  For example, first year students will take a litigation skills lab in their first semester. This lab will focus on a case study following the life of a tort case. The goal is to take students through a series of skills exercises and professionalism problems. Students also will face ethical issues that may arise in this sort of representation.  Then during their second year, they will refer back to the simulations from that lab experience during one of their legal research and writing courses. This will allow them to fully comprehend the issues brought up in the earlier session, Martin said.  “We’re breaking down the silos (and) creating a curriculum that builds on itself,” Martin said. “This integration across courses will give students a real set of skills.”

New York Law School

Talk about resume building – a recent group of New York Law School students can tell potential employers how they drafted a bill that Vermont signed into law this past summer.  Another group working on patent issues proved so successful that many received job offers from the law school’s partner companies, including IBM.

New York Law School is making history – and getting its students top-notch careers – through its academic centers, which focus on project-based learning. The idea, said Dean R Matasar, is to give students real-life skills such as team building, how to work on a deadline and the ability to respond to criticism in a positive way.  “The beauty of (project-based learning) is it challenges students to engage in the project – and lets the whole world judge their work,” Matasar said.The students who helped draft the Vermont law were part of the law school’s Virtual Company Project, a course in the Institute for Information Law & Policy. Students helped write a bill that outlined how virtual corporations should be formed, and Vermont legislators embraced the idea, Matasar said.

The other example is from the Peer-to-Patent program, where second- and third-year students work with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Faculty members and students worked with the governmental office, private industry and other experts to help create a community patent system pilot that was put into practice.  The program started with New York’s top-ranked students, but it has proven so successful that Matasar said he hopes to roll it out to the rest of the school within a year or two.

Saint Louis University School of Law

It may sound strange, but doing puzzles just might improve a person’s success in law school.  That is because they are kinesthetic learners, so cutting up a document and arranging the pieces helps them feel how an analysis should be put together, explained Christine Rollins, director of Saint Louis University School of Law’s Legal Research and Writing Program.  The law school recently committed itself to a program that changes how its professors teach based on their students’ learning style. While the results are still preliminary, Rollins said the law school sees great promise.  “It’s hard to be creative after saying the same thing three or 400 times. This has made everything more enjoyable for us and brought the excitement back into the classroom,” Rollins said.

Here’s how it works. Incoming students take a 13-question online test. The VARK software lets students know their preferred method of learning based on the answers given, Rollins said. The results are: visual, audio, reader/writer, kinesthetic or a combination of several of these.  During the first go-around, some 300 students or 85 percent completed the test. Faculty members, privy to this information, could then adjust their lesson plan to touch on as many different styles as possible.  “Most of law school by design is a reader/writer or an oral approach because of the Socratic method. But those are not the only people who come to law school,” Rollins said. “We choose to present materials in more than one way to assure that more students get the concepts in their own language.”

Seattle University School of Law

Self-reflection rarely receives the time it deserves during law school. But that is exactly what the educators at Seattle University School of Lawwant their students to do.  To that end, the law school is introducing a “professional formation portfolio,” said Vice Dean Annette Clark. The idea is to give students a framework to inform their choices of courses, volunteer activities, externships and other opportunities – and to assist faculty advisors in providing meaningful guidance.

The portfolio will outline the range of skills and proficiencies that represent the diverse experiences students will face as lawyers, such as writing, interviewing, negotiation and empirical reasoning. During their second and third years, as students pursue specific interests – such as immigration law or family law – they can also evaluate which courses or other activities will enable them to round out their portfolios.

“It’s a tremendous tool for students,” Clark said. “It makes our goals for our students transparent, and it highlights the notion of students being intentional about their own education.”  Having an outline of their law school achievements also will be a benefit when they are ready to apply for jobs, Clark said. Students will have a laundry list of sorts to show what they learned and how that improved their skills set, and, more importantly, affects their character as a practicing attorney.  The portfolios also will show the law school areas for improvement, allowing the faculty to alter or update their curriculum, Clark said.  “We’re all about aspiration,” Clark said.

Syracuse University College of Law

If he had his way, Tomas Gonzalez would give each student at Syracuse University College of Lawtheir own personal chef.  That is how important the Director of Student Resources believes good health, exercise and nutrition is to the law-school experience.  So while he cannot hire Emeril Lagasse, Gonzalez offers students time with area chefs during what he has dubbed “Wellness Wednesdays.” Along with a quick lunch, the cooks show students how to prepare fast meals and set up menus that will give them the energy they need.

Gonzales feels his job as head of student services is to make law school a more personable experience. He also makes sure the law school offers students leadership development, knowledge about diversity issues and information about disabilities – all things they are going to need when they begin to practice their profession.  His efforts begin even before students come on campus. His staff works with incoming 1Ls to help them define their learning style and adapt it to the rigors of law school. Gonzales also personally meets with every student and introduces them to the office, its mentors and services.

“Our staff actively engages the students from the beginning to make sure they’re comfortable and find the support they need on and off campus,” said Gonzales, who even brings in masseuses to help students relax during high-stress times.  “The traditional law establishment may question our holistic approach, but that’s an attitude rooted in the old style. That’s not what we’re about,” Gonzales said.

Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center

Some law students go through three years of schooling barely stepping foot into a real courtroom. Not so at Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center.  Thanks to two entirely original programs, Touro students are immersed in the courtroom and public advocacy from the moment they arrive, said Dean Lawrence Raful.

Its Public Advocacy Center is the first in the nation. Touro had some space within its new facility, so the law school decided to mix public interest legal service as well as pro bono legal assistance together.  Now in its second year, the Public Advocacy Center is 16 offices that house agencies in areas such as housing, immigration, domestic violence and civil rights. Each tenant receives a rent-free office in exchange for one thing: a promise to use Touro students in advocacy services, research work and client relations.

“Students are able to work at various hours for the agencies because it’s all in one building, and students who are working there are telling other students of the significant progress they are making,” Raful said.  Additionally, Touro has the benefit of being the only U.S. law school with two courthouses on campus. To take advantage of this situation, Touro launched its unique Court Observation Program and made it the cornerstone of its new curriculum.  “Our students … watch trials, meet judges and lawyers, go through various types of courts and watch trials from arraignment to the penalty phase,” Raful said. “Students see good lawyers and maybe less than competent lawyers, and there is education in that experience, too.”

University of Detroit-Mercy School of Law

Just call him Flash – UDM’s new dean Mark Gordon swung into action from the moment he arrived on campus. He has turned a sleepy little law school into one making headlines across the globe.  He’s doing it by creating unique learning and job opportunities for the law school’s students. For example, UDM is the only law school in the continental United States in which students can take up to one-third of their credits toward the JD degree in Spanish.

And while many law schools have environmental clinics, how many actually handle U.S. Department of Justice environmental enforcement actions? The clinic’s professor is a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney, and the students have to undergo federal background checks before starting the clinic.

Then there is the much-lauded Law Firm program. Developed with lawyers from around the nation, the Program requires upper-level students to work on simulated complex transactions like large national firms handle. Each course is essentially a different department of the law firm, and the Program now has 15 different departments up and running.  “Students in the Law Firm Program that become summer associates tell us they cannot believe how far ahead they are,” Gordon said.  UDM also has gotten plenty of attention for its Mobile Law Offices – recreational vehicles that are firms on wheels. Recently, UDM sent students around the country to help veterans seeking federal disability benefits. So far, students and faculty have been to more than 35 cities in nine states, with many more to come.

Washington & Lee University School of Law

For those students who think the third year of law school is redundant, take a look at the new curriculum at Washington & Lee University School of Law.  These fresh 3L courses are pushing out of the classroom and into the real world. The new focus is experiential, explained Dean Rodney Smolla, giving students a blend of simulated and actual practice experiences. The courses are in a pilot program this year with hopes of including all of the law school’s students by 2010.

While the courses have the traditional names (Corporate Law or Bankruptcy), they will focus on fictitious clients, cases and files that students will need to work through as young attorneys, Smolla said. He said an advisory board of working lawyers and alumni helped construct the new curriculum based on what they are seeing in today’s law firms and courtrooms.

Students also will have a year-long Professionalism Program that examines what makes modern-day lawyers tick, touching on everything from the profession’s traditions to firm economics to leadership issues.  “The rational is that most law students become good by the end of their second year at legal doctrine and theory. What they need is practice at problem solving, counseling clients, advocacy on behalf of clients and all of the other aspects of practicing that make it so stimulating,” Smolla said.  “The practice of law is not an essay or multiple-choice exam. The practice of law is dealing with people, businesses and organizations to solve problems,” he added. “We’re helping them to be lawyers and not just think like lawyers.”

This guest post was authored by Karen Dybis and published in the 2009 Winter issue of preLaw Magazine.  Click here for the link to the digital issue of the magazine or visit the preLaw Magazine website for more great content about law school.

Leave a comment